miércoles, 1 de febrero de 2012

Adaptación de arañas machos al canibalismo de las hembras

Ian Sample, corresponsal de ciencia
01 de febrero 2012

Un estudio sugiere que la ruptura de sus propios órganos sexuales durante el sexo permite a los machos fecundar a sus parejas y evitar ser comidos vivos

Araña macho malabarensis Nephilengys puede perder sus órganos sexuales, conocidos como los palpos , durante la cópula. Las imágenes muestran a un macho intacto (izquierda), un medio eunuco (centro) y un eunuco. Fotografía: Lee Qi Qi
Llega un momento en la vida de una araña macho cuando su conducta reproductiva le conduce a tenar encuentros sexuales y tal vez perder los órganos genitales.

Los científicos se han preguntado por qué algunos machos evolucionaron hasta sacrificar sus genitales en el acto de reproducción, ya que las lesiones podrían dejarlos estériles.

Pero ahora una respuesta puede estar a mano después de una serie de experimentos meticulosos por Daiqin Li, un ecólogo conductual de la Universidad Nacional de Singapur.

Los investigadores dirigidos por el Dr. Li estudiaron una especie de araña tejedora llamada malabarensis Nephilengys . Los machos son mucho más pequeños que las hembras y muy frecuentemente son comidos por sus parejas durante la cópula.

Antes del acto de canibalismo, al cual escapan algunos machos, el órgano sexual del macho, conocido como un palpo, es seccionado dentro de la hembra. A veces la hembra quien corta el palpo, pero los machos participan en el comportamiento también. Las arañas macho generalmente nacen con dos palpos.

El equipo de Li tomó 25 machos vírgenes y los puso en las redes donde las hembras están en espera. Todas las arañas se acoplaron, dejando a 22 machos con los palpos completamente cortada y tres con los genitales parcialmente dañadas.

Los científicos entonces disectaron los ejemplares para rastrear lo que sucedió con el esperma de las arañas. Sólo una tercera parte había entrado en las hembras, con el resto todavía están al acecho en los palpos rotos.

Otras pruebas, que se describen en la revista Biology Letters ( ver más adelante ), revelaron que el palpo del macho permaneció alojada en la hembra, y con más spermatozoides llegando a ella, aumentando las posibilidades de fecundación. El palpo roto también sirvió como un bloque eficaz, inhibiendo a la hembra de la acción de otros machos.


El Dr. Li dijo a The Guardian que no estaba claro cómo los palpos rotos llegaron a inseminar a la hembra después de haber sido separados del macho, pero dijo que tal "cópula a distancia" era algo más que un simple drenaje de esperma en la hembra.

Li cree que los machos evolucionaron hasta perder sus palpos, porque la estrategia les permitió fertilizar las hembras, incluso si el órgano se rompiera en cuestión de segundos o la hembra se comiera al macho vivo.

"Copulación a distancia probablemente evolucionó a partir del conflicto de intereses entre machos y hembras, como una contra-adaptación a la agresión de las hembras hacia los machoss, los cortos tiempos de cópula forzadas por las hembras, y la alta tasa de canibalismo", dijo.

Las lesiones de los machos sostienen que sean más agresivos, con las arañas eunuco más agresivos que aquellos con un palpo, y aquellos con dos palpos mucho menos agresivo. Esto también podría trabajar en su favor, ya que son más capaces de luchar contra otros machos que se acercan a la hembra.



Remote copulation: male adaptation to female cannibalism

Abstract

Sexual cannibalism by females and associated male behaviours may be driven by sexual conflict. One such male behaviour is the eunuch phenomenon in spiders, caused by total genital emasculation, which is a seemingly maladaptive behaviour. Here, we provide the first empirical testing of an adaptive hypothesis to explain this behaviour, the remote copulation, in a highly sexually cannibalistic orb-web spider Nephilengys malabarensis. We demonstrate that sperm transfer continues from the severed male organ into female genitals after the male has been detached from copula. Remote copulation increases the total amount of sperm transferred, and thus probably enhances paternity. We conclude that the mechanism may have evolved in response to sexual cannibalism and female-controlled short copulation duration.

1. Introduction

Sexual conflict, divergence between the reproductive interests of males and females, can lead to antagonistic coevolution in which adaptations in each sex select for counter-adaptations in other [1]. Sexual cannibalism by females and the associated male behaviours are examples of antagonistic coevolution driven by sexual conflict [1–5]. In many highly sexually cannibalistic spiders, males adopt a monogynous mating strategy, typically mating with one or two females (spiders have paired genitals) [4]. However, in spite of mono- or bigyny, polyandry may continue to serve interests of females [5]. To counter female polyandry, however, males have evolved mate guarding, male sacrifice to a cannibalistic female, genital mutilation resulting in mating plugs, and mechanisms that increase the quantity of sperm transferred [3,4,6,7].

In spiders, male genital mutilation, the breakage of a male's palp within the female genitals, is common in mono/bigynous and highly sexually cannibalistic species, and is typically characterized by breakage of the tip of the male palp [6]. However, some spider species further exhibit the ‘eunuch phenomenon’, whereby males break off the entire palp [8–12] (figure 1). While this seems maladaptive because eunuchs are functionally sterile, several adaptive hypotheses have been suggested [10–12]. The broken male parts may effectively plug the female genitals (epigynum) leading to paternity protection—the mating-plug hypothesis [9,11,12]. Yet, entire emasculation is not necessary for effective plugging, and so additional functions of emasculation have been suggested, including the better-fighter hypothesis; indeed, eunuchs are more aggressive and agile compared with intact males [12]. Finally, the remote copulation hypothesis postulates that eunuchs secure continuing sperm transfer through the severed palp attached to the epigynum [12,13], but to date this has remained untested. Here, we test for continual sperm transfer after genital severance in an extremely sexually dimorphic and cannibalistic nephilid orb-web spider, Nephilengys malabarensis (Araneae: Nephilidae).
Figure 1.
Nephilengys malabarensisfemale with a severed male palp (red box) lodged in her epigynum after copulation, and a half-cannibalized male at her side.

2. Material and methods

(a) Study subjects

Juvenile and subadult N. malabarensis were collected in the field, housed in controlled environmental conditions [11,12], and monitored until adulthood, so that their mating history and precise age (days elapsed from the final moult) were known. Only virgin spiders were used in trials.

(b) Mating trials

We staged each mating trial by introducing a virgin male onto a virgin female web (n = 25). All trials ended with copulation and genital damage, either through entire palp severance or only partial palp damage. We recorded the copulation duration as the time elapsed from palp insertion until breakage. To estimate the pattern of sperm transfer after copulation, the broken palp was allowed to remain in the epigynum (figure 1) for varying times (0–1255 s) before we experimentally removed it.

(c) Sperm quantification

Immediately after palp removal from the epigynum, we placed it in a 2 ml tube to prevent the loss of remaining sperm. The female's genitals were dissected, and all reproductive parts placed in a separate tube.

The number of sperm in each of the reproductive parts was quantified separately using a modified sperm-counting procedure [14–17] (see the electronic supplementary material for details). Samples containing either the used palp or isolated female reproductive organs were extracted and placed on a haemocytometer. Sperm were counted under a compound microscope for each sample. Calculations were then performed to obtain the average number of sperm present in the used palp or female reproductive organ. Our sperm quantification was deemed reliable, judging by rare sperm clumping in the samples and high correlations between the sperm counts [14–17].

(d) Female- and male-initiated palp breakages

The inserted palps could be broken by either sex. In female-initiated palp breakages (n = 14), the female terminated copulation by cannibalization (figure 1) or by pulling the male away from her epigynum. In male-initiated palp breakages, the male deliberately severed his palp (n = 8). In all cases, copulation termination results in palp breakage and its lodging in the epigynum. Copulation durations of female- and male-initiated palp breakages were recorded.

3. Results

All copulations (n = 25) led to palp damage either through entire palp severance (88%, n = 22) or partial severance leading only to palp damage (12%, n = 3). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of female versus male-initiated palp breakage frequencies (female-initiated: 63.6%; Graphic , p = 0.201, n = 22). However, female-initiated severance resulted in significantly shorter copulation durations than did male-initiated palp breakages (t 20 = −2.746, n = 22, p = 0.012; figure 2 a).
Figure 2.
Copulation duration and sperm transfer pattern inNephilengys malabarensis. (a) Mean (± s.e.m.) copulation durations resulted from female- (n = 14) and male- (n = 8) initiated entire palp breakages. (b) Mean (± s.e.m.) percentage (%) of sperm transferred to females during copulation through female- and male-initiated palp breakages. (c) A linear relationship between the log number of sperm transferred to female epigynum and the log time interval (s) elapsed between palp breakage and experimental palp removal (n = 22).
There was a mean number of 3309 (±271) sperm (range: 1300–7400; n = 22) present originally in each copulating palp. Female-initiated palp breakages resulted in significantly fewer sperm transferred into spermatheca during copulation (t 20 = −3.031, n = 22, p = 0.007; figure 2 b). About 67–72% of sperm were still left in the broken palp lodged in the epigynum when the male and female separated. However, GLM results showed that sperm transfer continued after copulation termination: the longer the broken palp was left lodged in the female before its experimental removal, the more sperm were transferred (table 1 and figure 2 c). Female-initiated palp breakage significantly increased the number of sperm transferred to female since the palp breakage (table 1), suggesting that female-initiated palp breakage induced faster sperm transfer in a given time. Moreover, a significant two-way interaction between the sex-initiating palp breakage and the time before experimental palp removal showed that, after female-initiated breakage, a significantly shorter time was needed to transfer equal sperm quantity from the emasculated palp to the female (before experimental palp removal) compared with male-initiated palp breakage (table 1). Other explorative variables (copulation duration, number of sperm remaining in the palp and male size) did not have significant effects on the number of sperm transferred (table 1).
exploratory factors Wald χ 2 d.f. p
time interval from palp breakage 11.315 1 0.001
sex initiated palp breakage 11.406 2 0.003
copulation duration 0.188 1 0.665
number of sperm remaining in the emasculated palp 1.170 1 0.279
CW 1.805 1 0.179
sex initiated palp breakage × time from palp breakage 4.584 1 0.032
sex initiated palp breakage × copulation duration 2.669 1 0.102

Table 1.
Results from a generalized linear model testing the effects of five explorative factors (the time interval since palp breakage until its experimental removal from the epigynum, the sex initiated palp breakage, copulation duration, male size (carapace width: CW), and the number of sperm remaining in the palp) on the number of sperm transferred to the female's spermatheca. The data for the dependent variable and all the continuous predictors were log-transformed. The maximal model that including all five factors and all possible interactions was fitted using normal with identity link and gamma with log link error. Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to select the best model. Goodness of fit: AIC = 4.154; Omnibus test:χ 2 = 117.4, d.f. = 8, p < 0.0001.

4. Discussion

Our results clearly show that remote copulation enables continual sperm transfer from severed palp to female genitalia even after male detachment from copula. It not only directly prolongs the duration of potential sperm transfer, but also in fact increases the amount of transferred sperm. This may reduce sperm competition by increasing the eunuch's fertilization success and paternity.

Remote copulation probably evolved as a male counter-adaptation to female aggression towards mates, female-enforced short copulation durations and, ultimately, the high prevalence of female sexual cannibalism (reaching 75%, [12]). Partial palp breakage, common in spiders (here only in 12% of copulations), functions as mate plugging [6]. However, internal plugs do not necessarily prevent female remating [10–12,18], and cannot lead to continuous sperm transfer. Remote copulation is hence a function exclusive to complete palp emasculation, a taxonomically scattered phenomenon known in nephilids [8] and the theridiids [13,19]. A totally severed palp facilitates both plugging and continuous sperm transfer after the eunuch's detachment from copula.

Females may control copulation duration by sexual cannibalism: amounts of transferred sperm are thus seen as the ultimate manifestation of sexual conflict [20–21]. The frequency of palp breakage initiations did not differ between males and females; however, female-initiated cases resulted in shorter copulation durations and lower numbers of transferred sperm. This implies that copulation duration in N. malabarensis, while already short (average 8.3 ± 1.1 s) compared with other spiders [22–25], is subject to female choice [20]. With only about 28–33% sperm transferred before palp severance, the male's reproductive capacity is greatly reduced. However, sexual conflict commonly leads to sexually antagonistic coevolution, where male persistence strategies evolve to counter female resistance to monopolization [10,12]. Mate plugging to monopolize females is a common male response to sexual conflict [26], but our study suggests that remote copulation is an additional male adaptation to sexual cannibalism and to female control of copulation duration. Remote copulation enables the male to maximize his reproductive potential through (i) continuous sperm transfer after detachment from copula and (ii) prolonged female monopolization, during which the female is unavailable to rival males.

Another important finding is that the males transferred sperm even faster via broken palps after female-terminated copulations (table 1). This suggests that eunuch males may not, ultimately, suffer a paternity cost. However, it is unclear why the rates of sperm transfer differ between male- and female-terminated copulations. Presumably, there is an advantage of rapid ‘remote’ transfer after female-initiated breakages, but less so after male-initiated ones. However, there might have been a difference in the rate of sperm transfer if the duration of remote transfer had not been manipulated. Further studies are needed to test these hypotheses.

In sum, the adaptive significance of eunuchs seems to be justified judging from their evolutionary persistence [10]. Perhaps, there are other functions of palp severance in addition to plugging [9], remote copulation (this paper) and enhanced eunuch aggressiveness [12,26], which may further justify the high costs of male sterility.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund (AcRF) grant to D.L. (R-154-000-435-112), in part by the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS) grants to M.K. (J1-2063 and 1000-10-720023) and Humboldt's grant to S.K.F. We thank Poh Moi Goh and Chun Hong Cheung for providing fruitflies and house flies. Spiders were collected under research permit (NP/RP10-036) granted by Singapore NParks.
  • Received December 8, 2011.
  • Accepted January 11, 2012.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Arnqvist G.
    2. Rowe L.
    2005 Sexual conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    1. Elgar M. A.
    2. Schneider J. M.
    2004 The evolutionary significance of sexual cannibalism. Adv. Study. Behav. 34, 135–163. (doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(04)34004-0)
  3. ↵
    1. Miller J. A.
    2007 Repeated evolution of male sacrifice behavior in spiders correlated with genital mutilation. Evolution 61, 1301–1315.(doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00115.x)
  4. ↵
    1. Schneider J. M.
    2. Fromhage L.
    2010 Mongynous mating strategies in spiders. In Animal behaviour: evolution and mechanisms (ed. Kappeler P. M.), pp. 441–464. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  5. ↵
    1. Slatyer R. A.
    2. Mautz B. S.
    3. Blackwell P. R. Y.
    4. Jennions M. D.
    2011Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta-analysis. Biol. Rev. 87, 1–33. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00182.x)
  6. ↵
    1. Uhl G.
    2. Nessler S.
    3. Schneider J. M.
    2010 Securing paternity in spiders? A review on occurrence and effects of mating plugs and male genital mutilation. Genetica 138, 75–104. (doi:10.1007/s10709-009-9388-5)
  7. ↵
    1. Simmons L. W.
    2001 Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  8. ↵
    1. Kuntner M.
    2. Coddington J. A.
    3. Hormiga G.
    2008 Phylogeny of extant nephilid orb-weaving spiders (Araneae, Nephilidae): testing morphological and ethological homologies. Cladistics 24, 147–217.(doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00176.x)
  9. ↵
    1. Kuntner M.
    2. Agnarsson I.
    3. Gregorič M.
    2009 Nephilid spider eunuch phenomenon induced by female or rival male aggressiveness. J. Arachnol.37, 266–271. (doi:10.1636/St08-67.1)
  10. ↵
    1. Kuntner M.
    2. Coddington J. A.
    3. Schneider J. M.
    2009 Intersexual arms race? Genital coevolution in nephilid spiders (Araneae, Nephilidae). Evolution63, 1451–1463. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00634.x)
  11. ↵
    1. Kuntner M.
    2. Kralj-Fišer S.
    3. Schneider J. M.
    4. Li D.
    2009 Mate plugging via genital mutilation in nephilid spiders: an evolutionary hypothesis. J. Zool.277, 257–266. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00533.x)
  12. ↵
    1. Kralj-Fišer S.
    2. Gregorič M.
    3. Zhang S.
    4. Li D.
    5. Kuntner M.
    2011 Eunuchs are better fighters. Anim. Behav. 81, 933–939.(doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.02.010)
  13. ↵
    1. Knoflach B.
    2. van Harten A.
    2001 Tidarren argo sp. nov. (Araneae: Theridiidae) and its exceptional copulatory behaviour: emasculation, male palp organ as a mating plug and sexual cannibalism. J. Zool. 254, 449–459.(doi:10.1017/S0952836901000954)
  14. ↵
    1. Bukowski T. C.
    2. Christenson T. E.
    1997 Determinants of sperm release and storage in a spiny orbweaving spider. Anim. Behav. 53, 381–395.(doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0329)
    1. Bukowski T. C.
    2. Linn C. D.
    3. Christenson T. E.
    2001 Copulation and sperm release in Gasteracantha canfiformis (Araneae: Araneidae): diffential male behavior based on female mating history. Anim. Behav. 62, 887–895.(doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1834)
    1. Snow L. S. E.
    2. Andrade M. C. B.
    2004 Pattern of sperm transfer in redback spiders: implications for sperm competition and male sacrifice. Behav. Ecol.15, 785–792. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arh080)
  17. ↵
    1. Herberstein M. E.
    2. et al.
    2011 Sperm storage and copulation duration in a sexually cannibalistic spider. J. Ethol. 29, 9–15. (doi:10.1007/s10164-010-0213-5)
  18. ↵
    1. Schneider J. M.
    2. Thomas M. L.
    3. Elgar M. A.
    2001 Ectomised conductors in the golden orb-web spider, Nephila plumipes (Araneoidea): a male adaptation to sexual conflict? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49, 410–415.(doi:10.1007/s002650000307)
  19. ↵
    1. Knoflach B.
    2002 Copulation and emasculation in Echinotheridion gibberosum (Kulczynski, 1899) (Araneae, Theridiidae). In European arachnology 2000 (eds Toft S., Scharff N.), pp. 139–144. Aarhus, Denmark:Aarhus University Press.
  20. ↵ 
    1. Elgar M. A.
    2. Schneider J. M.
    3. Herberstein M. E.
    2000 Female control of paternity in the sexually cannibalistic spider Argiope keyserlingi. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 2439–2443. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1303)  Abstract / FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Schneider J. M.
    2. Gilberg S.
    3. Fromhage L.
    4. Uhl G.
  22. 2006 Sexual conflict over copulation duration in a cannibalistic spider. Anim. Behav. 71, 781–788.(doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.05.012)
  23. ↵
    1. Andrade M. C. B.
    1996 Sexual selection for male sacrifice in the Australian redback spider. Science 271, 70–72.(doi:10.1126/science.271.5245.70)
    1. Schneider J. M.
    2. Herberstein M. E.
    3. De-Crespigny F. C.
    4. Ramamurthy S.,
    5. Elgar M. A.
    2000 Sperm competition and small size advantage for males of the golden orb-web spider Nephila edulis. J. Evol. Biol. 13, 939–946.(doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00238.x)
    1. Elgar M. A.
    2005 The duration of copulation in spiders: comparative patterns. Rec. West. Aust. Mus. Suppl. 52, 1–11.
  26. ↵
    1. Schneider J. M.
    2. Elgar M. A.
    2001 Sexual cannibalism and sperm competition in the golden orb-web spider Nephila plumipes (Araneoidea): female and male perspectives. Behav. Ecol. 5, 547–552.(doi:10.1093/beheco/12.5.547)
  27. ↵
    1. Kralj-Fišer S.
    2. Kuntner M.
    2011 Eunuchs as better fighters?Naturwissenschaften. (doi:10.1007/s00114-011-0873-1)

Posted by Unknown at 16:56
Etiquetas: , , ,

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario

Nota: solo los miembros de este blog pueden publicar comentarios.

Suscribirse a: Enviar comentarios (Atom)