Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta New York. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta New York. Mostrar todas las entradas

sábado, 23 de noviembre de 2013

New York's Green Roofs Are Crawling With Fungi

Microscopic photo of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus courtesy of the USDA's Agricultural Research Service. USDA
Demand for green roofs might plummet if they became known as "fungal roofs." But that is what they are, at least in New York – and contrary to what it may sound like, it's not a bad thing.

The world just became a little more aware of the hidden-but-teeming biomass of green roofs thanks to the intrepid work of researchers from Barnard College, Columbia University, Fordham and the University of Colorado. Recently, these guys found themselves wondering if the gardens in the sky might support different kinds of life than the stuff at dog-pee level. It's a realm into which few scientific minds have tread. While green roofs as heat-island dampeners and rainwater-runoff plugs have been widely discussed, the extent to which they serve as urban "biodiversity reservoirs" (in the researchers' words) is something of a mystery.

So in the summer of 2011, the team set out to test the soil composition of 10 green roofs stationed at recreation centers throughout the five boroughs:
(Map courtesy of Jeremy Law at Columbia University)
Using soil corers, they hunted for fungi, because fungal communities play a key role in a roof garden's health and longevity. For comparison's sake, they also took samples from five city parks near some of the roofs, including Central Park and the High Line. A little magic from "[i]nductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy" at Alabama's Auburn University Soil Testing Laboratory, as well as a dollop of phospholipid fatty-acid extraction and Illumina-dye sequencing, and they had their results, which were published this month in the journal PLOS ONE.

So what were the conclusions? 
For one, these sun-kissed carpets of gray goldenrod and smooth blue aster are absolutely crawling with fungi. The researchers logged an average of 109 types of fungi per roof, such as Glomus, Acaulospora, Rhizophagus and Funneliformis, suggesting that green roofs can indeed contribute to urban biodiversity. As they explained:

We found that green roofs supported a diverse fungal community, with numerous taxa belonging to fungal groups capable of surviving in disturbed and polluted habitats. Across roofs, there was significant biogeographical clustering of fungal communities, indicating that community assembly of roof microbes across the greater New York City area is locally variable. Green roof fungal communities were compositionally distinct from city parks and only 54% of the green roof taxa were also found in the park soils.

In other words, the roofs are home to fungi not typically given to squelching around in normal parkland. They also seem to be better for growing stuff you might, you know, put in your mouth: While the soil in New York's parks showed a greater biomass of microbes, it also tested higher for heavy metals, a scourge of urban gardens that can be unhealthy if consumed in larger quantities.

Here's a comparison the researchers put together illustrating how the roofs stacked up against the parks, in terms of the abundance of fungal phyla:
Needless to say, this is hardly the first news of green roofs supporting life. The elevated gardens are routinely patrolled by insects and in some cases much larger fauna. In Australia, for instance, the Adelaide Zoo maintains several grassy roofs that are designed as homes for urban plants and wildlife, like reptiles, insects and bats.

And an immense green roof in the U.K., mounted on a wastewater treatment facility near Brighton, attracts seagulls and crows that pluck at its quaking grass in search of food. To fight those hungry birds, the roof's overseers have released even more animals over the roof – ferocious goshawks, a golden eagle and even a great horned owl.


ORIGINAL: Atlantic Cities
John Metcalfe
Mar 13, 2013

jueves, 1 de noviembre de 2012

For Years, Warnings That It Could Happen Here

ORIGINAL: NYTimes
Published: October 30, 2012

The flooded entrance to the tunnel leading to the Franklin D. Roosevelt Drive in Lower Manhattan after the storm on Tuesday. Damon Winter/The New York Times
The warnings came, again and again.

Multimedia





For nearly a decade, scientists have told city and state officials that New York faces certain peril: rising sea levels, more frequent flooding and extreme weather patterns. The alarm bells grew louder after Tropical Storm Irene last year, when the city shut down its subway system and water rushed into the Rockaways and Lower Manhattan.

On Tuesday, as New Yorkers woke up to submerged neighborhoods and water-soaked electrical equipment, officials took their first tentative steps toward considering major infrastructure changes that could protect the city’s fragile shores and eight million residents from repeated disastrous damage.

Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo said the state should consider a levee system or storm surge barriers and face up to the inadequacy of the existing protections.

“The construction of this city did not anticipate these kinds of situations. We are only a few feet above sea level,” Mr. Cuomo said during a radio interview. “As soon as you breach the sides of Manhattan, you now have a whole infrastructure under the city that fills — the subway system, the foundations for buildings,” and the World Trade Center site.

The Cuomo administration plans talks with city and federal officials about how to proceed. The task could be daunting, given fiscal realities: storm surge barriers, the huge sea gates that some scientists say would be the best protection against floods, could cost as much as $10 billion.

But many experts say, given what happened with the latest storm, that inertia could be more expensive.

After rising roughly an inch per decade in the last century, coastal waters in New York are expected to climb as fast as six inches per decade, or two feet by mid century, according to a city-appointed scientific panel. That much more water means the city’s flood risk zones could expand in size.

"Look, the city is extremely vulnerable to damaging storm surges just for its geography, and climate change is increasing that risk," said Ben Strauss, director of the sea level rise program at the research group Climate Central in Princeton, N.J. “Three of the top 10 highest floods at the Battery since 1900 happened in the last two and a half years. If that’s not a wake-up call to take this seriously, I don’t know what is."

With an almost eerie foreshadowing, the dangers laid out by scientists as they tried to press public officials for change in recent years describes what happened this week: Subway tunnels filled with water, just as they warned. Tens of thousands of people in Manhattan lost power. The city shut down.

What scientists, who have devoted years of research to the subject, now fear most is that, as soon as the cleanup from this storm is over, the public will move on.

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg is known worldwide for his broad environmental vision. But one former official said it had been difficult to move from theoretical planning to concrete actions, and it was hoped that the storm this week would change that.

“A fair question to ask is, have we been as focused as we need to be for emergency preparations,” said the former official, who spoke on condition of anonymity so as not to jeopardize ties to the administration. "We’ve just been lucky. We need hardening for the risk we’ve always faced. Until things happen, people aren’t willing to pay for it."

A state report on rising sea levels, issued on the last day of Gov. David A. Paterson’s administration in 2010, suggested that erecting structural barriers to restrain floodwaters could be part of a broader approach, along with relocating buildings and people farther from the coasts.

Mr. Bloomberg, during a briefing Tuesday, said he was consumed now with the urgent task of getting the city going again, and it was too soon to determine what steps should be taken.

Storm surge barriers represent the most dramatic potential change. They have been installed in Europe and some American cities and are designed to close during a storm to block surging waters from reaching shore.

Under a proposal put forth by the Storm Surge Research Group at Stony Brook University in 2004, large portions of the city could be protected by three movable barriers installed at the upper end of the East River near the Throgs Neck Bridge, under the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge and at the mouth of the Arthur Kill between Staten Island and New Jersey.

Still, some experts consider the barriers a last resort, and urge more modest changes, including subway floodgates. Task forces convened by the city and state have pushed to make the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and Consolidated Edison systems more resistant to storm damage. Some of that work is under way: After a deluge paralyzed the subways for several hours in 2007, the transit agency spent $34 million on some flood protections. No additional state money has been forthcoming for an overhaul.

Robert Puentes of the Brookings Institution said that the city, to its credit, had developed a coastal storm plan that treated seriously the city’s susceptibility, given its 520-mile coastline. But he said that “most of that focuses on mapping a response to the disaster after it already occurs.”

jueves, 25 de octubre de 2012

What NYC would look like as carbon dioxide

ORIGINAL: 350.org

New York City's greenhouse gas emissions as one-ton spheres of carbon dioxide

Each sphere represents one ton of CO2. If you dumped these spheres onto NYC, this is what the city would look like.

1:35 - You see what the emissions would look like after one hour 
1:47 - Emissions after one day 
2:00 - Your jaw will drop at the emissions after one year 
Truly awe-inspiring!

jueves, 26 de julio de 2012

Massive Genomics Center Set to Open in Lower Manhattan

An artist's rendition of the New York Genome Center exterior at 101 Avenue of the Americas, Manhattan.
NEW YORK—For a spot news junkie, the sight of a podium-studded dais surrounded by people holding up recording devices is irresistible, especially on a hot summer day. So, I was delighted to happen this morning upon such a press conference on my way to the Scientific American office. The event was held to announce a 20-year lease location for the New York Genome Center—101 Avenue of the Americas. Call the area SoHo. Call it Hudson Square. The area could use some stronger economic juice, and New York City lately is also angling for greater leadership in the life sciences and tech sector.

The goal is to make the site the largest genomic research center in North America.

Construction is under way at the LEED Silver-certified building to house seven stories of labs and offices to support genomic sequencing and analysis with Illumina technology, bioinformatics, data mining and translational medicine (transforming discoveries into drugs and devices into treatments). A total of 11 mostly New York-area academic institutions, and some pharmaceutical and tech firms, will collaborate on the center. About $115 million has been raised so far. The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation is among the donors, along with the Simons Foundation, Bloomberg Philanthropies, Russell L. Carson, Anthony B. Evnin, and WilmerHale, but apparently the center will just get the city’s name as its moniker. No egos.

NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Thomas Kelly of the NYGC Executive Committee 
The labs are set to open in spring 2013 (initially they were to open this year), giving the city a chance to start competing more aggressively with Boston and other U.S. small cities (not to mention China) in genomics research, a bit late to the party. Within a year, the center will generate 100 new jobs, said Mayor Michael Bloomberg at the event.

“Five years from now, this will grow to 500 new research jobs and the startups resulting from work here, work that could do so much to vanquish disease and reduce suffering around the world. It really is going to be amazing,” he said.

“And we’ll also produce thousands more jobs for New Yorkers and continue the ongoing revitalization of Lower Manhattan,” he added. “I think we can talk about the effects here but really the effects on the whole world are what’s most important.”

The involved research institutions include Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Columbia University, Cornell University/Weill Cornell Medical College, The Jackson Laboratory, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York University/NYU School of Medicine, North Shore-LIF Health System, Rockefeller University and Stony Brook University.

Data warehousing will be provided at a biometric- and key-access-only site called the Sabey Intergate. Manhattan facility at 375 Pearl Street, guarded by NYPD and Homeland Security personnel. A pilot site for the Genomics Center currently is housed at Rockefeller University.

The center will soon undertake a large-scale whole genome sequencing project to study the genetic basis of susceptibility to Alzheimer’s disease in at least dozens of patients’ samples, with the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, part of North Shore-LIJ. The data from this effort will be made open access to the scientific community.

“Our data mining capabilities both at this site and in connection with the Sabey data storage capabilities are key to navigating…datasets for new insights into how variations and patterns amongst regulatory networks in human cells cause disease,” said Nancy Kelley, founding executive director of the Genome Center.

“Data mining may also be key to identifying the reasons for adverse drug reactions and why some patients do not respond to currently available treatments. While genomics is a relatively new field, the recent discoveries in this area have been remarkable. They have had enormous impact for patients with cancer, Parkinson’s disease, cardiovascular disease, psychiatric disorders and type 2 diabetes.”

Below are some more pics from the Genome Center’s Web site that have the usual futuristic and social oddness to them of architectural renderings.


About the Author: Robin Lloyd is responsible for editing and assigning stories for ScientificAmerican.com. She also manages Scientific American's Twitter feed, @sciam. Follow on Twitter @robinlloyd99.

miércoles, 11 de julio de 2012

A library for materials



Material ConneXion (materialconnexion.com) (A Sandow Company) is the leading global platform for material solutions and innovations. Built on the belief that Every Idea has a Material Solution™, we are the trusted advisor for Fortune 500's, smaller forward-thinking companies, and government agencies seeking a creative or competitive edge through strategic material selections. With offices in New York, Bangkok, Beijing, Cologne, Daegu, Istanbul, Milan, Seoul, and Shanghai, Material ConneXion's international network of material specialists provide a global, cross-industry perspective on materials, sustainable alternatives, and their potential uses.

Sandow, a leader in publishing and in building multichannel, vertically integrated brands, acquired Material ConneXion in May of 2011, establishing a merger of forces from the design, materials and publishing realms.

Material ConneXion maintains the largest subscription-based Materials Library of innovative materials and processes in the world—an indispensable asset to a wide audience of designers and architects and a vital tool for the development of design, industry and economy.

Andrew Dent, vice-president of Material ConneXion in New York and keeper of a library of innovations, explains how recycling and biomimicry will shape the materials of the future

jueves, 15 de marzo de 2012

New Frog Species Found in New York City

ORIGINAL: Wired
By John Timmer, Ars Technica 



March 14, 2012

Image: A Northern Leopard Frog, similar to the newly discovered species. (brian.gatwicke/Flickr) 


We tend to think of the discovery of a new species as requiring a trip to a remote and exotic location. But our ability to use DNA to determine how closely populations are related has revealed an unexpected fact: Lots of plants and animals that look indistinguishable to the human eye are actually quite distant from each other genetically, often far enough to merit a new species designation. In the latest example, researchers have found that a population of leopard frogs that make their home in the New York City area are probably a newly discovered species.

According to the press release accompanying the new paper, the leopard frogs in the region were noted as having a croak that was quite distinct from those of the two species that inhabit the northern and southern parts of the East Coast. (A researcher involved in the finding described the other species as having a “long snore” or a “rapid chuckle.”) Speculation had focused on the possibility that the New York frogs were a hybrid of the two species, but molecular evidence shows that they are distant from both.

Although New York City has probably not been especially kind to the frogs — any appropriate habitat for them in Manhattan is probably long gone — they still survive in a number of areas nearby, including New Jersey, Staten Island, and the Bronx. The researchers suggest that their range is probably centered on Yankee Stadium. Given the molecular evidence, the team that found the species (which has members in New Jersey, Alabama, and California) are now going back to study it more closely so that they can give it a formal description.

Citation: “A new species of leopard frog (Anura: Ranidae) from the urban northeastern US.” By Catherine E. Newmana, Jeremy A. Feinbergb, Leslie J. Risslerc, Joanna Burgerb, H. Bradley Shaffer. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, published online Feb. 2, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.01.021
Source: Ars Technica