Biomimicry is the practice of looking deeply into nature for solutions to engineering, design and other challenges in creating a long-term, sustainable world. In this episode of "This Planet:"
"Biomimicry" features science writer Janine Benyus, showing how mimicking nature solves some of our most pressing problems, from reducing carbon emissions to saving water. Then watch two short videos about applications of the biomimicy principles.
“Cockroach Robots To The Rescue!" demonstrates what happens when a tiny robot is taught to move like a cockroach.
"Lotus 7.0" explores a work of art that mimics nature, by Dutch artist Dan Roosegaarde.
“Biomimicry” was directed by Leila Conners, produced by Mathew Schmid and Bryony Schwan, with executive producers Roee Sharon Peled and George DiCaprio and sponsored by Leonardo DiCaprio via Tree Media.
“Cockroach Robots To The Rescue!” was produced by Roxanne Makasdjian and Stephen McNally, UC Berkeley Poly-PEDAL Lab.
Chasing Ice won the award for Excellence in Cinematography at the 2012 Sundance Film Festival and a 2013 Emmy Award for Outstanding Nature Programming.
It has won over 40 awards at festivals worldwide, and was also nominated for an Academy Award for Best Original Song, "Before My Time" by J. Ralph featuring Scarlett Johansson and Joshua Bell.
Founded in 2007 by James Balog, the Extreme Ice Survey (EIS) is an innovative, long-term photography program that integrates art and science to give a “visual voice” to the planet’s changing ecosystems. We believe that the creative integration of art and science can shape public perception and inspire action more effectively than either art or science can do alone.
EIS maintains an extensive portfolio of over one million single-frame photos celebrating the the art and architecture of ice. We have 43 Nikon cameras watching over 24 glaciers in Antarctica, Greenland, Iceland, Alaska, Canada, Austria, and the Rocky Mountains. Our cameras record changes in the glaciers every hour, year-round during daylight, and yield approximately 8,000 frames per camera per year. We combine these images intostunning time-lapse videos that reveal how quickly climate change is transforming large regions of our planet. Our pictorial archive serves as a visual legacy and provides a baseline—useful in years, decades and even centuries to come—for revealing how climate change and other human activity is dramatically impacting the planet.
EIS is a program of Earth Vision Institute (EVI). Visit the EVI Events page to track our traveling exhibition “ICE: Portraits of Vanishing Glaciers” and watch and share our videoswith your community. It is our work to share the ‘voice’ of the glaciers with you; if you are moved and inspired by what the glaciers have to say, please use your voice and share it.
A Greenpeace photo dated Oct. 14 shows steel plants in northern China's Hebei province. (Lu Guang / Greenpeace)
'Under the Dome,' new film on China's air pollution woes,
is quickly viewed by over 150 million online
Documentary about air pollution in China goes viral days before two key legislative sessions
The hottest movie in China this weekend wasn’t “Fifty Shades of Grey” or Jackie Chan’s latest, “Dragon Blade.” Instead, a pointed and emotional environmental online documentary has swept the country by storm, putting its air pollution crisis front and center days before the country's annual legislative sessions.
“Under the Dome,” made by a popular former reporter from China Central Television, was released online Saturday. By Monday, it had been viewed more than 150 million times on video portals, dominating social media such as WeChat and Weibo in the way the blue-black dress phenomenon recently swamped the Internet in the U.S.
The Chinese public is really eager for knowledge, actions and solutions. ... People really want a platform and a vehicle to join in the debate and dig deeper into the problem.- Li Yan, head of climate and energy, Greenpeace East Asia
The fact that the film was not censored and was posted on the website of the People’s Daily, the Communist Party mouthpiece, indicated a substantial degree of official support.
A cross between Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth,” a TED talk and a Lifetime tear-jerker, Chai Jing’s film personalizes the smog problem while holding officials’ feet to the fire in ways rarely seen in Chinese media. It suggests how ordinary citizens can take action to demand stricter government controls.
The state-run energy sector comes in for particular criticism, while the impotence of environmental officials is also revealed. More than 20 government officials are interviewed in the film. Chai even traveled to London and Los Angeles to look for answers about how those cities solved their air pollution problems.
The documentary landed just days before this week’s opening of both the National People’s Congress and the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference. Though the two bodies are largely seen as rubber-stamp gatherings, they are closely watched for signals about shifts in the government’s priorities and agenda, and the environment is expected to be a key topic this year.
“Under the Dome” also debuted just a day after China named a new environment minister, Chen Jining, who was plucked from his post as president of the prestigious Tsinghua University. The move was a rare example of China appointing a minister who didn’t come up through the bureaucracy, and Chen reportedly sent Chai a text message congratulating her on the film.
In “Under the Dome,” Chai admits that for years she was not worried about pollution and never wore a face mask. But she became concerned about China’s dirty skies after discovering during her pregnancy that her unborn child had a benign tumor. She reportedly financed the $160,000 project herself.
Though she refrains from making a direct causal link between smog and the tumor in the film, she says, “When you carry a life inside you, what she breathes, eats and drinks are your responsibility, and you feel fear.”
Though most of the facts presented in “Under the Dome” have been widely presented in foreign and Chinese media, Chai’s celebrity and her approachable style (she uses a cartoon to illustrate what PM 2.5 means, for example) resonate.
“The Chinese public is really eager for knowledge, actions and solutions, and she did a good job of putting all the information together in an easy-to-understand way,” said Li Yan, head of climate and energy at Greenpeace East Asia. “People really want a platform and a vehicle to join in the debate and dig deeper into the problem.”
In Chinese premier Li Keqiang's annual Government Work Report to China's lawmakers at the opening of their 2015 plenary session, he called pollution a "blight on people's quality of life and a trouble that weighs on their hearts". He has also promised to build a more...
Li predicted that the film’s “unusual” popularity would help empower the Environment Ministry. “The timing of this is really unique, coming ahead of the ‘two meetings’ and with a new environment minister coming on the job,” she added.
But interest in Chai’s film chafed a bit for some longtime players in environmental circles.
“Lots of the statistics she presented had already been released many years ago and many of these issues had already been exposed,” said Wu Di, an environmental photographer. “Now we have to pay attention just because Chai Jing is doing a documentary?”
Still, he said, it was a “great thing” that the film was raising awareness – though he questioned how long the “fever” might last.
Among those interviewed in “Under the Dome” are Xie Zhenhua, deputy director of the powerful National Development and Reform Commission; Han Jun, deputy director of the Communist Party’s central finance affairs office; and Xiong Yuehui, director of the science standards office at the Ministry of Environmental Protection.
“About over 60% of the steel factories opened without any approval process. But can you really shut them down or replace them?” Xiong says in the film. “A 10-million-ton steel factory can support 100,000 workers. The steel industry in Hebei [province] has become uncontrollable.”
Ding Yan, director of the vehicle pollution department at the Ministry of Environmental Protection, says in the film that he is “embarrassed” about his work because his agency is so toothless.
In the film, Chai flies over L.A. in a helicopter and points out that the city has managed to decrease pollution even while adding cars to the roads. She hangs out with inspectors doing spot checks of pollution emitted by big rigs, and films a trucker who is being fined $1,000 because his vehicle was caught spewing smoke. (The L.A. segment begins about 1 hour and 17 minutes into the film.)
But in China, Ding tells her his agency doesn’t have the authority to replace or confiscate trucks that fail emission standards.
“So when you go out enforcing the law, you don't even dare to show your teeth?” Chai asks Ding. He replies: “I can't even open my mouth. How can I worry about others seeing my teeth?”
Viewers commenting on the film on the Sina web portal expressed both approval of Chai’s efforts and frustration at the government.
“After watching this documentary, I'm very angry. I finally understand what those ‘public servants’ are doing every day. They're all jerks and only know how to get money from the ordinary people,” wrote one. “Our party, please wake up. Otherwise, no one will trust you anymore.”
At the end of the film, Chai encourages the public to report polluters to a government hotline. Between 8 p.m. Saturday and 6 p.m. Sunday, the Beijing hotline saw the number of calls increase 240% over normal and the city’s environmental protection bureau had to add more operators to the hotline, the Beijing Youth Daily reported.
But in a poll conducted by Phoenix TV after the film’s release, 33.5% of the 27,240 respondents said they have no faith in the government and do not expect the smog to be cleaned in the near future.
Tommy Yang and Nicole Liu in The Times’ Beijing bureau contributed to this report.
Follow @JulieMakLAT on Twitter for news out of Asia
Broadcast (2007) Forty million years ago a diverse community of insects living at the bottom of a tree in a temperate forest chanced into a sticky pool of pine resin. Then a mere 67 years ago a young boy named David Attenborough was given the amber stone containing the entombed bugs. "Jewel of the Earth" explores the remarkable time capsule of ancient life preserved in this and countless other samples of fossilized tree resin, or amber.
Sir David Attenborough, now grown up and a celebrated naturalist and TV personality, hosts the program. As he makes abundantly clear in the show, he is still entranced with the amber specimen from his youth and the seemingly magical quality of the material to serve as a crystal-clear window to an age before humans walked the Earth. Coincidentally, David's brother Richard starred in the movie that made amber famous: Jurassic Park, in which Richard plays a billionaire entrepreneur who extracts DNA from amber-entombed mosquitoes in order to clone living replicas of their prey—dinosaurs. While such a scenario is probably unlikely, amber can resurrect prehistoric life in a quite different way, as NOVA demonstrates by probing the amber-encased clues that paint a fascinating picture of ancient biomes.
For example, most of the world's amber comes from the Baltic region of northern Europe, where, on the ample evidence of insects, plant fragments, and other trapped material, a vast temperate forest flourished about 40 million years ago. Sir Attenborough's boyhood keepsake is a piece of Baltic amber, which he investigates through a microscope with the help of biologist Elzbieta Sontag of the University of Gdansk, finding a long-legged fly, a fungus gnat, an aphid, an ant, and a mite—all denizens of the lower forest floor. By contrast, much of the amber found in the Dominican Republic—the second most significant source studied so far—is about 20 million years old and hails from an ancient rain forest. George and Roberta Poinar of Oregon State University have reconstructed this vanished ecosystem in spectacular detail, based on such clues as a tadpole that probably resided in a water-filled tropical bromeliad before being upended, along with a marsh beetle, into a patch of tree resin that eventually turned into amber.
An even more ancient Dominican sample, from 150 million years ago, contains a honeypot ant. Since this ant is now found only in Australia, the specimen is evidence for a conjectured super-continent that once comprised most of Earth's landmasses. High-tech medical scanners have shed light on many other amber inclusions, diagnosing a broken back on a gecko, for instance, which suggests the lizard was a bird's prey before being accidentally dropped into resin. The most controversial research on amber, however, is the effort to extract DNA from trapped creatures, just like in Jurassic Park. So far, two teams, including the Poinars, have announced success. However, follow-up studies indicate the DNA found by both groups was a contaminant, not the real, ancient stuff. Setbacks aside, scientists have only just begun to reveal the secrets to be discovered in the warm, glowing, glassy world of amber.
